Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Reinhardt's avatar

A good read, thank you. The quotes you've pulled are incredibly prescient.

The challenging aspect of modern technology is that it's inherently magical. Idols were imbued with demons by carving sigils into stone (think printed circuit boards), saying a spell to animate the idol (programming), charging the inanimate object with energy through sacrifice of a natural being (electricity), and getting it to do "your" will, which leads to the Faustian outcomes you describe here. This is even more stark with modern LLMs, which are truly just tokenized Ouija Boards and (in my opinion) can never be "baptized".

It seems like the more you use this power, the more you're taken in by it regardless of your intent or the intent of its designers. It's still all black magic, you're still under the spell of the hardware and software engineers, and the Internet allows them to cast "spells" globally. It's the one technology we would all be better off without but also the least likely to be cast off.

Maybe a demon will not incarnate in your work email inbox, but we certainly "animate" other demons by feeding data to the surveillance State and Silicon Valley.

Some kind of radical asceticism akin to the Amish or Orthodox Old Believers seems to be the only solution, if not to that extreme. If clothes are the first technology invented after the Fall to shield us from our nakedness, it seems we should in good conscience strive to remove as much of our technological garments as we can.

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

"I seek to trace the novel features under which despotism may appear in the world. The first thing that strikes the observation is an innumerable multitude of men, all equal and alike, incessantly endeavoring to procure the petty and paltry pleasures with which they glut their lives. Each of them, living apart, is as a stranger to the fate of all the rest; his children and his private friends constitute to him the whole of mankind. As for the rest of his fellow citizens, he is close to them, but he does not see them; he touches them, but he does not feel them; he exists only in himself and for himself alone; and if his kindred still remain to him, he may be said at any rate to have lost his country."

https://rawhistory.com/democratic-despotism-as-described-by-alexis-de-tocqueville/

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts